Legal

California Property Taxes and Prop 13



When somebody inherits a home via a will, trust, intestacy or by gift, it is not necessarily true that the value of the home will be re-assessed for property tax purposes. This can be especially important to a beneficiary who inherited a home from his parents or grandparents since they probably had a low base year value of their home. For example, if Bobby Beneficiary inherited a home, currently valued at $1 million dollars, from his late parents who had purchased the home for $50,000 decades ago, he would not be liable to pay property taxes on the assessed value of $1 million dollars but rather on $50,000, plus annual adjustments. (See Example 4).

Of note, Proposition 13 caps the levying rate for property taxes in California at 1%. Cal Const art XIIIA, 1.

The following are examples of situations in which the transfer will not result in a “change in ownership” and thereby avoid the dreaded re-assessment for property tax purposes.

1. Transfers in which proportional ownership interests remain the same before and after transfer

For example, Husband and Wife own a rental home in joint tenancy (50/50 split) and transfer it to a limited liability company in which they have same membership interest (50/50 split). Rev & T C 62(a).

2. Transfers to revocable trusts

For example, Husband and Wife execute a revocable (living) trust and transfer the home they live in into the trust by transferring title from themselves to the trust by naming the trustee of their revocable trust as owner. Rev & T C 62(d).

3. Interspousal transfers

For example, Husband and Wife own their home in joint tenancy, Husband dies and Wife inherits the other half of the house. Rev & T C 63.

4. Parent-child (or grandparent-grandchild) transfer

For example, in the case of a Parent-Child transfer, Husband and Wife own a home and have one child, Son. Husband and Wife pass away and Son inherits the home. Furthermore, in the case of a Grandparent-Grandchild transfer, Grandparent is only survived by a Grandchild, that is no child of the Grandparent outlives the Grandparent. Rev & T C 62.

5. Persons over age 55 or who are severely and permanently disabled may transfer the base-year value of a residence to a replacement dwelling in the same county, or in another county if the board of supervisors of that county adopts an ordinance granting base-year-value relief to replacement dwellings when the original dwelling was located in another county

As of this writing, seven counties (Alameda, Los Angeles, Orange, San Diego, San Mateo, Santa Clara, and Ventura) have ordinances granting base-year-value relief to replacement dwellings when the original dwelling was located in another county per Rev & T C 68-69.5. For example, Person purchases a home in San Jose (Santa Clara County) and upon reaching the age of 55 sells their home in San Jose in order to purchase a home in Redwood City (San Mateo County) so they can be closer to their family.

By: Shahram Miri

The Making Homes Affordable Program



Introduction

Using money from the “Troubled Asset Recovery Program” (TARP) legislation passed last year to bail out the banks, President Obama has enacted a plan through the Treasury Department to help “at-risk” homeowners by giving incentives that will enable you to refinance directly with your current lender at today’s low interest rates and help keep you in your home. The eventual goal of this “Homeowner Stabilization Plan” is designed to rewrite the terms of approximately 9 -10 million mortgages to provide assistance for “at-risk” homeowners who might otherwise lose their home without new mortgage terms. Over $100 billion dollars have been allocated to support the implementation of this plan. Homeowners with eligible mortgages held by Fannie or Freddie will be eligible for refinancing. Homeowners with private mortgages may be eligible for subsidized loan modifications. The plan has now been initiated as of March 4, 2009, but only accepts borrowers who entered into their loans prior to January 1, 2009. The last date that the plan is currently slated to accept new participants is December 31, 2012.

The Nuts and Bolts of the Program

If your mortgage is held by Fannie or Freddie, you may be eligible to refinance if 31% of your monthly income is greater than or equal to the monthly payment on a 30 year fixed mortgage at the current market rate. The property in question must have lost market value to the point where you have less than 20% equity, and are thereby unable to refinance on the open market. While properties with some negative equity (that are slightly “underwater”) are eligible, the loan cannot be for more than 105% of the market value of the property.

If your mortgage is NOT held by Fannie or Freddie, or, if it is and and you don’t meet one or more of the other criteria, you may be eligible for a five (5) year loan modification. The goal of the modification is to reduce your monthly payment to 31% of your gross (pre-tax) monthly income. This is accomplished by temporarily reducing the interest rate on the loan. If the interest rate required to reduce the monthly payment to 31% of income is less than the payment on a 30 year fixed loan at the current market rate, the interest rate on the loan is then gradually stepped back up on a yearly basis until it matches the current market rate at that time of participation.

In trying to get to a monthly payment that is 31% of your income, the lowest effective interest rate that a lender may offer is 2%. If a 2% interest rate does not result in a monthly payment that is 31% of your income, the lender might, in some circumstances either extend the term of the loan or forego principle on the loan. Principle forbearance might be on a permanent basis, but more likely it will be on a temporary basis resulting in an eventual balloon payment.

The major distinction between these two types of mortgages under the MSA is that 1) mortgages held by Freddie and Fannie could be eligible for refinancing and 2) Mortgages that are privately held may qualify for loan modification.

There is a widely held notion, fueled perhaps by the lack of valid information on the MSA, that it is only available to homeowners with mortgages held by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. Although the MSA makes a distinction between Freddie and Fannie mortgages and private mortgages, the relief available is actually very similar. The MSA categorizes Freddie and Fannie mortgages separately from other mortgages, because Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae are now, in effect, owned by the federal government and must conform to the direction of the Treasury Department.

* TARP and the MSA

The power to implement the MSA was given to the Treasury Department under the TARP legislation. TARP was passed by Congress in January of 2008. Although known for the bailout of major investment banks, TARP also has a provision related to troubled mortgages.

Indeed, TARP provides the Treasury Department the means by which to leverage better rates from mortgage companies. Under the guidelines for the MSA put out by Treasury thus far, if a lender has received any financial assistance under TARP (most mortgage lenders), the lender is obligated to participate in the MSA and to renegotiate new terms for struggling mortgage holders.

Under ? 2 (9)(A), TARP defines “troubled assets” as,

Residential or commercial mortgages and any securities obligations or other instruments that are based on or related to such mortgages, that in each case was originated or issues on or before March 14, 2008, the purchase of which the Secretary [of Treasury] determines promotes financial market stability.

TARP, ? 2 (9)(A.)

Thus, the definition of “troubled assets” to be purchased by the Treasury explicitly includes residential or commercial mortgages … originated or issued on or before March 14, 2008.” Id.

TARP delegates the implementation of the program to Treasury, providing that the Treasury will develop its own regulations in implementing what “troubled assets” to purchase. TARP. Section 101 (Purchases of Trouble Assets) provides for the Treasury to determine what troubled assets to purchase and under what guidelines:

Authority – The Secretary is authorized to establish the TARP to purchase and to make and fund commitments to purchase, troubled assets from any financial institution, on such terms and conditions as are determined by the Secretary.

TARP ? 101 (a) (1)

Thus, TARP gave the Secretary of the Treasury the authority to determine what “troubled assets” to purchase and under what guidelines. It is under this framework that the MSA was developed and announced by President Obama in February, 2009, and now implemented.

* Goals and Guidelines

The following is a highlight of what information is now available to consumers. The MSA is aimed at “at risk” mortgages. The primary goal is to ” provide access to low-cost refinancing for responsible homeowners suffering from falling home prices.” Department of the Treasury.

One of the reasons for implementation of the MSA is that mortgage rates are currently at historically low levels, providing homeowners with the opportunity to reduce their monthly payments by refinancing. But under current rules, most families who owe more than 80 percent of the value of their homes have a difficult time securing refinancing. (For example, if a borrower’s home was worth $200,000, he or she would have limited refinancing options if he or she owed more than $160,000.) Thus, millions of responsible homeowners who put money down and made their mortgage payments on time have – through no fault of their own – seen the value of their homes drop low enough to make them unable to access these lower rates. The MSA is designed to help people in such situations.

For many families, a low-cost refinancing could reduce mortgage payments by thousands of dollars per year. For example, consider a family that took a 30-year fixed rate mortgage of $207,000 with an interest rate of 6.50% on a house worth $260,000 at the time. Today, that family has $200,000 remaining on their mortgage, but the value of that home has fallen 15 percent to $221,000 – making them ineligible for today’s low interest rates that generally require the borrower to have 20 percent home equity. Under the Treasury refinancing plan, that family could refinance to a rate near 5.16% – reducing their annual payments by over $2,300.

Working with the FDIC, other federal banking and credit union regulators, the FHA and the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the Administration has developed guidelines for sustainable mortgage modifications for all federal agencies and the private sector – bringing order and consistency to foreclosure mitigation. The guidelines include detailed protocols for loss mitigation as well for identifying borrowers at risk of default.

The Treasury Department has also issued the following summary of the benefits they expect to make available to eligible homeowners under the MSA:

* Focusing on Homeowners At Risk: Anyone with high combined mortgage debt compared to income or who is “underwater” (with a combined mortgage balance higher than the current market value of his house) may be eligible for a loan modification. This initiative will also include borrowers who show other indications of being at risk of default. Eligibility for the program will sunset at the end of three years.

* Reaching Homeowners Who Have Not Missed Payments: Delinquency will not be a requirement for eligibility. Rather, because loan modifications are more likely to succeed if they are made before a borrower misses a payment, the plan will include households at risk of imminent default despite being current on their mortgage payments.

* Common Sense Restrictions: Only owner-occupied homes qualify; no home mortgages larger than the Freddie/Fannie conforming limits will be eligible. This initiative will go solely to supporting responsible homeowners willing to make payments to stay in their home – it will not aid speculators or house flippers.

* Special Provisions for Families with High Total Debt Levels : Borrowers with high total debt qualify, but only if they agree to enter HUD-certified consumer debt counseling. Specifically, homeowners with total “back end” debt (which includes not only housing debt, but other debt including car loans and credit card debt) equal to 55% or more of their income will be required to agree to enter a counseling program as a condition for a modification.

* Shared Effort to Reduce Monthly Payments: Treasury will partner with financial institutions to reduce homeowners’ monthly mortgage payments.

- The lender will have to first reduce interest rates on mortgages to a specified affordability level(specifically, bring down rates so that the borrower’s monthly mortgage payment is no greater than 38% of his or her income).

- Next, the initiative will match further reductions in interest payments dollar-for-dollar with the lender, down to a 31% debt-to-income ratio for the borrower.

- To ensure long-term affordability, lenders will keep the modified payments in place for five years. After that point, the interest rate can be gradually stepped-up to the conforming loan rate in place at the time of the modification. Note: Lenders can also bring down monthly payments to these affordability targets through reducing the amount of mortgage principal. The initiative will provide a partial share of the costs of this principal reduction, up to the amount the lender would have received for an interest rate reduction.

- “Pay for Success” Incentives to Servicers : Servicers will receive an up-front fee of $1,000 for each eligible modification meeting guidelines established under this initiative. Servicers will also receive “pay for success” fees – awarded monthly as long as the borrower stays current on the loan – of up to $1,000 each year for three years.

- Responsible Modification Incentives: Because loan modifications are more likely to succeed if they are made before a borrower misses a payment, the plan will include an incentive payment of $1,500 to mortgage holders and $500 for servicers for modifications made while a borrower at risk of imminent default is still current.

- Incentives to Help Borrowers Stay Current : To provide an extra incentive for borrowers to keep paying on time under the modified loan, the initiative will provide a monthly balance reduction payment that goes straight towards reducing the principal balance on the mortgage loan. As long as the borrower stays current on his or her payments, he or she can get up to $1,000 each year for five years.

- Home Price Decline Reserve Payments: To encourage lenders to modify more mortgages and enable more families to keep their homes, the Administration — together with the FDIC — has developed an innovative partial guarantee initiative. The insurance fund – to be created by the Treasury Department at a size of up to $10 billion – will be designed to discourage lenders from opting to foreclose on mortgages that could be viable now out of fear that home prices will fall even further later on. This initiative provides lenders with the security to undertake more mortgage modifications by assuring that if home price declines are worse than expected, they have reserves to fall back on. Holders of mortgages modified under the program would be provided with an additional insurance payment on each modified loan, linked to declines in the home price index. These payments could be set aside as reserves, providing a partial guarantee in the event that home price declines – and therefore losses in cases of default – are higher than expected.

Source: Dept. of Treasury.

5. Plan Effectiveness and Other Guidelines.

The Treasury has further announced guidelines to maximize the effectiveness of the plan:

o Protecting Taxpayers: To protect taxpayers, the Homeowner Stability Initiative will focus on sound modifications. If the total expected cost of a modification for a lender taking into account the government payments is expected to be higher than the direct costs of putting the homeowner through foreclosure, that borrower will not be eligible. For those borrowers unable to maintain home ownership, even under the affordable terms offered, the plan will provide incentives to encourage families and lenders to avoid the costly foreclosure process and minimize the damage that foreclosure imposes on lenders, borrowers and communities alike. Moreover, Treasury will not provide subsidies to reduce interest rates on modified loans to levels below 2%.

o Counseling and Outreach to Maximize Participation: Under the plan, the Department of Housing and Urban Development will also make available funding for non-profit counseling agencies to improve outreach and communications, especially to disadvantaged communities and those hardest-hit by foreclosures and vacancies.

o Creating Proper Oversight and Tracking Data to Ensure Program Success: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will be responsible – subject to Treasury’s oversight and the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s conservatorship – for monitoring compliance by servicers with the program. Every servicer participating in the program will be required to report standardized loan-level data on modifications, borrower and property characteristics, and outcomes. The data will be pooled so the government and private sector can measure success and make changes where needed. Treasury will meet quarterly with the FDIC, the Federal Reserve, the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Federal Housing Finance Agency to ensure that the program is on track to meeting its goals.

o Limiting the Impact of Foreclosure When Modification Doesn’t Work: Lenders will receive incentives to take alternatives to foreclosures, like short sales or taking of deeds in lieu of foreclosure. Treasury will also work with the GSEs to provide data on foreclosed properties to streamline the process of selling or redeveloping them, thereby ensuring that they do not remain vacant and unsold.

The Treasury has also announced guidelines, recognizing that “clear and consistent guidelines for modifications are a key component of foreclosure prevention.” Dept. of Treasury.

These include:

* Working with the FDIC, other federal banking and credit union regulators , the FHA and the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the Administration is in process of developing guidelines for sustainable mortgage modifications for all federal agencies and the private sector – bringing order and consistency to foreclosure mitigation. The guidelines will include detailed protocols for loss mitigation as well for identifying borrowers at risk of default; the Administration expects to announce these guidelines by Wednesday, March 4 th

* Applying Guidelines Across Government and the Private Sector: Treasury will develop uniform guidance for loan modifications across the mortgage industry by working closely with the FDIC and other bank agencies and building on the FDIC’s pioneering role in developing a systematic loan modification process last year. The Guidelines – to be posted online – will be used for the Administration’s new foreclosure prevention plan. Moreover, all financial institutions receiving Financial Stability Plan financial assistance going forward will be required to implement loan modification plans consistent with Treasury guidance. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will use these guidelines for loans that they own or guarantee, and the Administration will work with regulators and other federal and state agencies to implement these guidelines across the entire mortgage market. The agencies will seek to apply these guidelines when permissible and appropriate to all loans owned or guaranteed by the federal government, including those owned or guaranteed by Ginnie Mae, the Federal Housing Administration, Treasury, the Federal Reserve, the FDIC, Veterans’ Affairs and the Department of Agriculture. In addition, these guidelines will apply to loans owned or serviced by insured financial institutions supervised by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Office of Thrift Supervision, the Federal Reserve, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the National Credit Union Administration.

* Requiring All Financial Stability Plan Recipients to Use Guidance for Loan Modifications: As announced last week, the Treasury Department will require all Financial Stability Plan recipients going forward to participate in foreclosure mitigation plans consistent with Treasury’s loan modification guidelines.

* Allowing Judicial Modifications of Home Mortgages During Bankruptcy for Borrowers Who Have Run Out of Options: The Obama administration will seek careful changes to personal bankruptcy provisions so that bankruptcy judges can modify mortgages written in the past few years when families run out of other options. (These have not yet been implemented – see below.)

* How Judicial Modification Works: When an individual enters personal bankruptcy proceedings, his mortgage loans in excess of the current value of his property will now be treated as unsecured. This will allow a bankruptcy judge to develop an affordable plan for the homeowner to continue making payments. To receive judicial modifications in bankruptcy, homeowners must first ask their servicers/lenders for a modification and certify that they have complied with reasonable requests from the servicer to provide essential information. This provision will apply only to existing mortgages under Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac conforming loan limits, so that millionaire homes don’t clog the bankruptcy courts. (Please see below, the details of this part of the Plan have not yet been approved by Congress.)

* Bolster FHA and VA Authority to Protect Investors and Ensure Loan Modifications Occur: Legislation will provide the FHA and VA with the authority they need to provide partial claims in the event of bankruptcy or voluntary modification so that holders of loans guaranteed by the FHA and VA are not disadvantaged.

Treasury Dept.

6. FHA and “Community Support”

The Treasury has also implemented guidelines under the MSA to provide for:

* Ease Restrictions in Federal Housing Administration Programs, Including Hope for Homeowners: The Hope for Homeowners program offers one avenue for struggling borrowers to refinance their mortgages. In order to ensure that more homeowners participate, the FHA will reduce fees paid by borrowers, increase flexibility for lenders to modify troubled loans, permit borrowers with higher debt loads to qualify, and allow payments to servicers of the existing loans.

* Strengthening Communities Hardest Hit by the Financial and Housing Crises: As part of the recovery plan signed by the President, the Department of Housing and Urban Development will award $2 billion in competitive Neighborhood Stabilization Program grants for innovative programs that reduce foreclosure. Additionally, the recovery plan includes an additional $1.5 billion to provide renter assistance, reducing homelessness and avoiding entry into shelters.

Treasury Dept.

7. Modification of Mortgage by Bankruptcy Trustee

As noted above, part of the Plan is to give bankruptcy trustees the power to rewrite mortgages. Congress is still negotiating the question of what power a bankruptcy trustee will have to modify a mortgage in bankruptcy. Currently, a trustee does not have the power to change the terms of a mortgage to avoid foreclosure. One intention of the MSA is to give bankruptcy trustees the power to modify terms to avoid foreclosure where it is possible, however Congress is still debating the details of that prong of the Plan.

All sources of info for this article were compiled from the most current guidelines available from the Treasury Department and no information was taken from private sources.

By: Jim Tily

Home Foreclosure or Voluntary Home Surrender – What Happens Next?



Due to the lagging Michigan economy and high home foreclosure rates, many homeowners have lost significant equity in their homes. In many cases, their homes are no longer worth what is owed to the bank. Some homeowners can no longer afford their mortgage to due to a job loss or pay reduction. Some homeowners simply don’t want to continue to pay on a home that has no equity. Either way, there is confusion about what happens if a homeowner turns their property back over to the bank. Will they be held liable for the mortgage balance? Will it reflect negatively on their credit? Here are the facts.

If a homeowner should surrender their home (voluntarily or through a foreclosure proceeding) because it is worth less than what they owe on it, a mortgage company may come after the homeowner after the sale of the property for the difference between what the house sold for and what they owed on the mortgage. In Michigan, as long as a home is sold for current fair market value, the homeowner may be responsible for any shortfall that may occur.

• Example: If a person owes $175,000 on their home and the current fair market value is $125,000 and the house is sold for the $125,000 (either at the foreclosure sale or after the redemption period (when the bank has taken back the property)), then the homeowners may be responsible for the $50,000 shortfall.

However, if an individual files for a bankruptcy, either before or after a foreclosure, they eliminate any deficiency claims a mortgage company may have. Surprising to many, a bankruptcy looks much better on your credit report than a straight foreclosure. Under the Federal Housing Administration’s (FHA) guidelines, you must be two (2) years past a bankruptcy filing in order to qualify for an FHA mortgage. Under Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac guidelines you must be 3 to 4 years past a bankruptcy to qualify for a more conventional mortgage. If you have a foreclosure on your credit, and have done nothing else (no bankruptcy filing) then it will typically be 5 years before you can purchase a home under FHA or Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac guidelines.

• Why so much longer? Because without a bankruptcy filing, future creditors will not know if there will be a repercussions because of the foreclosure (i.e deficiency claims that may pop up). What do you do when you have a new house and then find out you need to pay a debt on the house you lost a couple of years ago to a foreclosure (lenders will not take this chance – hence the 5 years).

There are two options for consumer bankruptcy: Chapter 7 Debt Elimination and Chapter 13 Debt Consolidation.

Filing a Chapter 7 is a straightforward process in which you are legally able to eliminate your unsecured debts such as: Loan deficiency balances (discussed above), credit card debts, medical bills, personal loans, certain older IRS debts, etc. The Chapter 7 bankruptcy provides a fresh financial start by wiping your credit clean of many debts that you are unable to pay.

Chapter 13 is a debt consolidation program. This is a 36 – 60 month court-authorized repayment process in which you make your best efforts to pay back your debts. We propose your repayment plan and establish your monthly budget. Through the program you can legally stop a foreclosure sale, remove a second mortgage or home equity loan, stop a judgment or wage garnishment, halt vehicle repossession and much more. The program prioritizes paying principal debt, so you can expect your credit to improve throughout the course of the program as you reduced your debt-to-income ratio and create a positive payment history through timely, consistent payments to your creditors. No more late reporting to the credit agencies! If you have more debt than you can reasonably pay off in the 36 -60 month timeframe, we can reduce a portion, if not the majority of your unsecured debts. The program focuses on reducing debt and improving credit while providing court protection during the process.

By: William Dale Johnson

What is a Real Estate Right of Refusal Agreement?



It is no secret that the world of real estate legal wrangling can be pretty confusing, especially if you aren’t an experienced legal expert. Many different types of contracts only differ by a small amount, such as the difference between a real estate option contract and a right of first refusal contract. Let’s take a look at how these two types of contracts differ and how each are valuable tools when you want to make the real estate deal of a lifetime.

First, let’s look at a real estate option agreement. When you sign a real estate option, you are paying a seller for the right to buy a particular piece of property for a particular set price for a set period of time. Let’s say that you are looking at a home in a hot neighborhood and the price being asked for the home keeps going up because of a bidding war. You can ask to create a real estate option that will allow you to pay a certain price for that home for the next 3 weeks. After that three weeks has expired, you lose the right to buy that home for that set price. The seller is under no legal binding agreement to sell you the home for that price and the seller can continue to try to sell the home to other buyers.

Now, with a right of first refusal agreement, you have the legal right to refuse another person’s attempt to buy a piece of property. Many people confuse the two of these contracts and assume that the right of first refusal comes with an option contract. Unless you have the right of first refusal spelled out in your option contract, you have to assume that you do not have any way to stop another party from coming in and buying a piece of property that you want.

When you have a right of first refusal contact with a seller, you have the option to buy a piece of property for the same price as another buyer. Let’s say that same home that is in that hot neighborhood gets a bid of one million dollars. You then have the right to cancel out that bid and place a bid for the same amount and the seller would then sell the home to you, instead. If you decline your right of first refusal, than the seller has the legal right to sell the home to that person who made the bid.

A seller may enter into a right of first refusal with a buyer if they had a previous working relationship and the seller wishes to give a friend a chance to pay market price for a property. It is a smart way to avoid any accusations of impropriety when it comes to selling a valuable piece of land because the price the property ends up being sold at is determined by the free market, not by any sort of collusion.

By: Mark Warner

No Stepped-Up Basis For Estate Inheritors of Those Dying in 2010



Up until 2010, property owned by a decedent at the time of death of his death had its tax basis changed from what the decedent’s basis was to its fair market value – whichever was higher. For the year 2010 – and only that year – the law has been changed to ‘whatever is lower’. This change will generally cost inheritors of decedents who die in 2010 more taxes down the line – especially for those inheriting houses. Here’s why.

Over the long run, most equities tend to increase in value. The owner of an equity property has a tax basis in it that’s usually the price he paid for it. As time goes on, with all things being equal, the fair market values of equities tend to increase – if only by the effects of inflation.

A prime example is a house. Typically a house owned by a decedent at his death has a tax basis to him that’s considerably less than its fair market value at the time of his death. In that case, an inheritor of a house from a decedent dying in 2009 had the house’s tax basis stepped-up to its fair market value.

That means if he sold the house right away, at its fair market value, he’d have no capital gain tax to be paid since the selling price equaled the it’s tax basis (stepped up to the fair market value). The stepped up basis would always benefit him no matter when he sold, too.

But now, under the same situation but for the decedent dying in 2010, the inherited house received by the inheritor with the same tax basis as it had in the hands of the deceased. That’s because, according to the 2010 law, the lesser (and not the greater) of the fair market value or the decedent’s basis becomes the inheritors basis.

So if the inheritor sold it right away or sometime in the future, he’d have a capital gain tax to pay based on the extent to which the selling price’s fair market value exceeds the decedent’s considerably lower tax basis. This law change comes from the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA). It provided for the repeal the law which gave the ‘whichever was greater’ provision at death for the change in tax basis for those dying after 2009. But remember, EGTRRA also eliminated all estate taxation for 2010. It was hoped that in 2001, we wouldn’t need the estate tax after 2009.

Fortunately, the ‘whichever is less’ provision should be in effect for estates of those dying during 2010 only. Presumably, legislators will get their act together during this year and arrange to bring back the usual ‘stepped-up basis’ (corresponding to ‘whichever is greater’) that estate property received. Unfortunately their actions will most likely bring back the estate tax with it too.

By: Shane Flait

Methods to Pass Your Home to Your Heirs



Many Florida residents plan to leave their home to their children. There are a variety of ways to pass your home to your heirs. Careful consideration of each method is vital, since each method has legal and financial ramifications, and may also impact on your long-term care planning.

1. You can deed your home to your child, giving you and your spouse the right to live there for the rest of your lives (a life estate).

Advantage: Your child will own the home when you pass on.

Disadvantage: You give up control. If you ever wish to sell your home, you will need your child’s permission. If you do sell, you will be entitled to a percentage of the proceeds based upon the value of the life estate.

Disadvantage: If you ever need to apply for Florida Medicaid for long-term care, Medicaid may consider the proceeds you receive to be a gift, which may negatively impact on your eligibility for a period of time.

2. You can make your child co-owner of the property – i.e., joint tenant with right of survivorship.

Advantage: When you pass away, your child will automatically inherit the home.

Disadvantage: Again, you have lost a degree of control. If you ever wish to sell the home, you will need your child’s consent. If the house is in fact sold, you will be entitled to half or less of the proceeds, depending on the percentages you and your child own.

Disadvantage: Your ability to get Medicaid in Florida long-term care benefits may be jeopardized for a period of time because of the monies you receive if you sell your home.

3. You can place the house in a living trust (also known as a revocable trust or inter-vivos trust).

Advantage: You will retain full control over the property while you are alive. Your child will inherit it after you pass on.

Disadvantage:It may be difficult to secure refinancing of your home should you ever wish to do so.

4. You can gift your house outright to your child.

Advantage: You and your child may derive satisfaction knowing that this is a “done deal,” with no strings attached.

Disadvantage: Your child now has full control over the property. Technically, he/she has the right to sell it or do anything else with it, without your consent.

Disadvantage: You will lose your Florida homestead exemption which would otherwise decrease the assessed value of your home for property tax purposes by $50,000.

Disadvantage: If your child does sell the house while you are alive, he/she will have to pay capital gains tax. If you had sold it, you would have been titled to a $250,000 capital gains tax exclusion for the sale of your primary residence.

Disadvantage: If your child sells the home after you die, your child will lose the step-up in basis and will have to pay capital gains tax based upon the original purchase price.

Disadvantage: If you apply for Florida Medicaid benefits for long-term care, the transfer of your home to your child may be considered a gift and may disqualify you from receiving benefits for a period of time.

5. You can place the home in an enhanced deed (ladybird deed), which gives you the right to remain in the home for the rest of your life, as well as the right to to sell it or give it away during your lifetime.

Advantage: Your child will automatically inherit the home when you pass away.

Disadvantage: You may face obstacles if you want to sell or refinance the property, since some lenders and title insurance companies are uncomfortable with this arrangement.

6. You can include a provision in your will leaving the house to your child.

Advantage: You remain in control of the property while you are alive.

Advantage: The property will go through probate and pass to your child when you die.

Disadvantage: The probate process can be expensive, time-consuming and inconvenient for your heirs.

Each of these methods must be examined within the context of your specific estate planning goals, and family and financial circumstances. Be sure to discuss the matter with a Certified Elder Law Attorney to determine the strategy that is best for you and your family.

By: Joseph Karp

Understanding Foreclosure Deficiencies and Debt Forgiveness



In today’s current real estate market, many owners are upside down on their real estate homes and/or investments. When the property is sold, whether voluntary or involuntary, this shortfall needs to be addressed one way or another and the effect of same can have substantial financial impact.

Being “upside down” means that the amounts owed on all loans on your property, determined at a specific time and in a specific manner, exceeds the value of your property. This “value” can change depending on whether the calculation is being made as a part of a deed-in-lieu, a short sale, or a foreclosure.

In a deed-in-lieu transaction, the owner transfers the property to the lender in satisfaction of the mortgage encumbering the property. If the lender determines that the value of the property in question is less than the mortgage debt, a deficiency arises. By way of example, if the lender is owed $329,000.00 at the time of the deed-in-lieu transfer date, and the lender has determined that the property’s value is only $270,000.00, a deficiency of $59,000.00 would exist.

In a short sale, the deficiency is determined based on the net proceeds received by the lender at the time of the sale. Using the same values described above, if the property is sold for $270,000.00, the net proceeds given to the lender will be substantially less. Assuming a six percent real estate commission, and traditional closing costs (documentary stamp tax, title insurance and tax credits), the net proceeds to a lender on the sale will likely be less than $250,000.00 resulting in a deficiency of over $79,000.00.

Deficiencies in a foreclosure are judicially determined after the foreclosure sale. If a lender is seeking a deficiency, the lender must apply to the court and provide appraisal information to support the valuation. The property owner has an opportunity to challenge the valuation by submission of evidence to support a higher valuation. At the deficiency hearing, the court determines the property’s value as of the foreclosure sale date and then calculates the amount of the deficiency.

If a deficiency exists, there are several possibilities that a property owner might face depending on what the lender chooses to do with regard to the shortfall. This includes debt forgiveness, collection by the lender or sale of the debt to a third party for collection. In addition, in many cases, an owner will have a first and second mortgage on their property. Generally the second mortgage lender gets little or no money, and may take action separate and apart from the action of the first mortgage lender, even if the loans are titled in the name of the same lender (most loan holders are servicing agents who may own a portion of or none of the actual loan and the actual owners may direct that different action be taken on each loan).

If the lender elects to forgive the indebtedness, the lender will send the property owner a Federal tax Form 1099-C. This is notice to you from the lender that the debt is cancelled and no collection effort will be made on the debt. The amount of the debt forgiven is determined in the same manner as the deficiency. Cancelled debt is generally treated as taxable ordinary income to the recipient of the debt relief unless some exception applies.

For example, if a property is foreclosed and the final judgment amount is $450,000.00, and the property has a value of $400,000.00 at the time of the foreclosure sale, the debt forgiveness will be $50,000.00. This $50,000.00 will be taxable income and treated as if someone paid you the actual money even though you did not receive any payment. If your blended tax rate is 20%, you would owe $10,000.00 in tax on this amount.

There are several exceptions to the taxability of the loan debt forgiveness. However, it is crucial that a Form 982 be filed with a tax return to make sure that the debt cancellation is addressed, regardless of whether the debt relief is taxable. The most common exceptions are as follows:

1. Qualified principal residence indebtedness: This is the exception created by the Mortgage Debt Relief Act of 2007 and applies to most homeowners.

2. Bankruptcy: Debts discharged through bankruptcy are not considered taxable income.

3. Insolvency: If you are insolvent when the debt is cancelled, some or all of the cancelled debt may not be taxable to you. You are insolvent when your total debts are more than the fair market value of your total assets.

4. Non-recourse loans: A non-recourse loan is a loan for which the lender’s only remedy in case of default is to repossess the property used as collateral. That is, the lender cannot pursue you personally in case of default. Forgiveness of a non-recourse loan resulting from a foreclosure does not result in cancellation of debt income.

The Debt Relief Act of 2007 was created to address the growing number of foreclosure on property for which the mortgage debt exceeds the value of the property. Effective for the tax year 2007 and valid through 2012, the Debt Relief Act allows homeowners to be exempt from taxation for debt forgiveness for loans up to two million dollars (one million for married couples filing separately) which secured the taxpayer’s primary residence. The Debt Relief Act has certain restrictions which may affect if any tax due as follows:

1. Only the debt given to acquire, build or substantially improve the residence is exempt. People who cashed out their equity via a refinance will only have a partial exclusion. For example, if the home was originally financed with a $300,000.00 loan, refinanced with a new loan for $400,000.00 in a cash out, and the value at foreclosure is $250,000.00 the taxpayer will have $50,000.00 in exempt income and $100,000.00 in taxable income.

2. The Debt Relief Act only applies to an owner’s primary residence. Second homes, rental property, vacation homes and investment property are excluded and debt relief on these properties will result in taxable income, unless another exception applies.

In order to obtain the exception, a taxpayer must complete new IRS Form 982 to evidence the debt forgiveness and to calculate the exemption amount. According to the IRS, in most cases the application under Form 982 only requires that a few lines be completed to obtain the appropriate relief.

As part of the debt forgiveness process, a careful examination of the amount forgiven and the value of the home listed on the 1099-C should be checked, especially if tax liability exists. If these figures are incorrect, the lender should be notified and an attempt to obtain a revised 1099-C should be made. If the lender refuses to make the corrections, you should consult a tax professional for assistance in challenging the 1099-C amounts with the IRS.

If the Lender does not forgive the indebtedness after foreclosure, short sale or deed-in-lieu, then the deficiency becomes an unsecured obligation of the maker on the note. In a foreclosure action, a deficiency is created by judicial determination. After the foreclosure sale, the lender applies to the court for a deficiency based on the value submitted by the lender. A property owner can challenge this valuation at the deficiency hearing by presenting evidence (appraisal or comparables) to support a higher value. At the hearing the court then determines the amount of the deficiency and awards the lender a judgment based on that amount.

If the deficiency arises from a short sale or deed-in-lieu, the lender must bring an action on the note against the maker, seeking the shortfall. As part of this process, a challenge to the amount due can be made. At the end of the lawsuit, the lender obtains a judgment against the maker under the note and can begin collection proceedings. In next month’s article we will discuss deficiency judgments and collections.

By: Michael Posner

Answers to Some of the Most Common Questions About HUD Homes



With the financial crisis still looming large over the country’s economy; this sure is a good time to purchase real estate. As a matter of fact, you can get some of the cheapest deals ever seen on HUD homes. If you are interested in buying a HUD code home and have questions about the buying process and the homes in general; then here are some answers for you:

What is the definition of a HUD Code home?

When people who cannot pay their FHA insured mortgage, the lender forecloses the home and HUD in turn purchases the homes from the lender becoming the owner of the property. Then the Department of Housing and Development ( HUD) offers the property for sale to recover their losses. HUD tries to sell the house at market value and since time is of essence to them so these homes are auctioned off.

Who can purchase a HUD home?

Almost anybody can bid on a HUD home. If you have enough liquidity or if you are pre-qualified for a mortgage, you can bid on a HUD if you have a pre- approved mortgage or if you have enough funds to purchase the home. There are; however, certain restrictions that the purchase is subjected to and if you qualify, you can certainly buy a HUD home. Even HUD employees and their relatives are eligible to buy a home but they will need to get a written approval from the HUD Director.

Are HUDhomes only appropriate for people in the lower income group?

HUD homes are certainly the cheapest housing options in the market today; they are suitable for people from the lower and the middle income groups.

Can I really get a HUD home for a dollar?

No, the purchase price of a HUD home is at par with the current market value of rthe property; this means that the price of a HUD home is based on the price of other similar homes in the area

Is HUD responsible for any repair work that need to be undertaken to upgrade the home to HUD compliance?

HUD is not responsible and nor will the department incur the cost of any repair work that needs to be undertaken to upgrade the house to be compliant with HUD code. These homes are sold “as-is” which means that there is no warranty on them. The asking price of a home is based on the condition of the home and will often be indicative of the fact the new owner will have to invest in order to renovate the premises. HUD may sometimes offer an allowance to upgrade the property or for moving expenses or a bonus for the early closing of the sale. The buyer can also request the department to pay a part of the closing or financing cost. Consult with your real estate agent or a HUD code attorney to get more details on what you are eligible for. It is also imperative to get the home inspected by a professional engineer so that you can get a fair idea about the amount of money that will have to be spent to upgrade the home and submit an appropriate bid.

Can I get a loan to buy a HUD home?

HUD does not offer loans directly; however there are several mortgage programs that HUD endorses. There is a lot of information about these lenders on the HUD website, you can read up and get in touch with these HUD approved lenders, so that they can take you through the right steps and ensure that you have good chance of getting the loan.

How can I find out about the HUD homes for sale in my area?

There are several websites that offer information on HUD homes try searching with the help of a search engine. Also, you should be able to find out about the HUD registered real estate agents in your area. It is important t consult with a HUD code attorney and a registered real estate agent when purchasing HUD properties. They are well versed in the requirements, limitations and possible issues that you may face while and after buying a HUD home.

By: Seomul Evans

Your IP Has No Value



Intellectual Property (IP) should be thought of as an asset. Possessed by a person or an organization, it is a tangible, definable quality that is valued by the marketplace. To calculate the value of your IP, similar to how you would for an M&A transaction, simply use the following calculation:

IP Value = (1/capitalization rate ie. 20%) X ((IP Price X IP Volume) – (IP Cost X IP Volume))

Unfortunately, most IT services firms use a more informal definition that simply conveys knowledge of a subject for the purpose of winning a project. Therefore the price associated with that IP is 0 and by definition, the overall value of that IP is 0. This plays out in the market place in many different ways.

We’ll start with the Sales division in a typical IT services firm. In the quest to close a major project, the rep and company management will give away jumpstarts, webparts, templates, assessments and more to the customer as a way to demonstrate expertise and to lower the overall cost of the project. They will provide these items as part of the project without ever establishing a value for them during the sales process or via an invoice to the customer. It is easy to justify because the asset was already developed on a past project and can easily be given away to win this one.

Similar to Sales, the Delivery team provides free code to customer in a stealth mode. Whether the company employs a code library or the developer saves code on his individual PC, Developers commonly give code to a customer without charging for it, effectively establishing a price for that code of 0. In addition, the altruistic concept of open source code has now captured the attention of a broad IT audience with sites like CodePlex giving away code from developers who simply want to share their wisdom with the marketplace for free. We are now starting to see this play out in the SharePoint market with developers giving away webparts, templates and creative that are easily integrated into a complete SharePoint solution.

Lastly, we’ll look at M&A transactions. In preparation for a sale, an IT services firm often writes an offering memorandum that provides details related to the company operations and value. Almost without exception, the firm will strive to communicate the value of their IP by stressing the number of projects completed in a certain vertical, business function or technology. The buyer, however, is looking at this in a completely different way. He is expecting to pay for the firm with some cash at close and then a share of earnings based on future performance and he expects that the value of the IP will be built into the future performance calculations. Again we come back to the original premise, if you are not charging for it, then the market will associate a value of 0 to it.

Compared to other industries, IT is still relatively young and immature. To better understand how it will evolve, we simply have to look at other industries that have been selling their products and services for longer periods of time. While it is easy to poke holes and say that we are not like them, it is also easy to learn from them and benefit financially. This is a partial list of actions that must be taken by IT services firms that truly want to maximize the value of their IP.

o Take an inventory of the company IP just like you would assemble an inventory of tangible assets like PC’s , Servers, furniture etc.
o Manage company IP as an asset by assigning an IP Manager responsible for the collection, management and sale of company IP.
o Establish a price for all IP.
o Provide evidence that the pricing is market based by placing the IP for sale on the web.
o Continue to learn more about productizing and marketing your IP as your offerings mature.
o Consider listing your products on specialty websites like the SharePoint Hub

That’s it. A simple premise that can’t be denied by most IT services firms. The only real question is whether to maintain the status quo or begin to realize the potential value in your IP.

By: Dave Stahlman

How Does Your Solicitor Assess the Value of Your Whiplash Compensation?



Every solicitor will need to prepare your whiplash claim as if it was going to go to a final Court hearing. In the majority of cases this will not happen, but your solicitor must always prepare for the worst case scenario. Therefore, they have to obtain as much evidence to support your claim as possible. The most important evidence that is needed relates to your medical condition.

If you have suffered a whiplash injury, your solicitor will need to obtain details of your medical history to ensure that you have not suffered previously with any neck problems. They will ask you to complete a form of medical authority which will allow them to write to your General Practitioner and obtain copies of your medical notes. They will also write to the Accident & Emergency Department if you attended hospital to obtain copies of the notes for your visit.

Reviewing The Medical Notes. Once they have received the medical notes, they will review them to ensure that the evidence supports your claim for pain and suffering. They do not do this to challenge your evidence, merely to support your evidence. They also need to examine the notes to see whether you have had any previous neck problems and to see whether the accident has aggravated those.

Instructing A Medical Expert. Once they have reviewed your medical notes your solicitor will have to instruct a medical expert to carry out a medical assessment. This could either be a General Practitioner or an Orthopaedic Surgeon. Before they can instruct an expert they have to agree the choice of expert with the other driver’s insurance company or solicitor. This usually happens by sending a choice of three potential experts, one of which is then approved by the insurers.

Once the name has been agreed your solicitor will send a letter of instruction detailing the circumstances of the accident and your subsequent injuries. A date will be arranged for you to attend a medical examination (you are normally welcome to take a friend or your partner with you) and a relatively brief review of your medical condition will be carried out. The Doctor will ask you to turn your head left and right, backwards and forwards, to assess any limits in the range of movements as a result of your injuries.

He will ask about your pre-accident medical history and will also have reviewed your medical notes (and reviewed the report from your solicitor).

Once the examination is complete you will leave the Doctor and he will prepare a report. You will be able to claim any travelling expenses to attend the appointment as part of your legal claim for compensation.

Sometime later the report will be received by your solicitor and will be reviewed to support your claim for compensation.

Other Evidence To Support Your Injuries. In addition to the medical evidence, if your injuries are relatively severe your solicitor may obtain statements from members of your family, your partner and friends. This will be important to detail the impact the injury has had on your day to day living. The other witnesses will be asked to attend the solicitor or he may interview them in their own home.

Other Evidence To Support Your Losses And Expenses. In addition to the evidence from the medical expert and witness statements, you will be asked to keep all receipts and wage slips (if you lost earnings) so that your solicitor can prepare a full and detailed account of your losses. The document he will prepare is called a ‘Schedule of Special Damages’.

Your solicitor will need all documentation so that he can prove to the other side (and to the Court if necessary) that you incurred these expenses and lost earnings or made other losses as a result of the accident. The documents required might include:

Wage slips (to show loss of earnings, bonuses and promotions etc). Receipts for repairs to your car. Car hire receipts (for a replacement car). Medication. Treatment receipts (e.g. physiotherapy or chiropractic treatment).

All of this evidence is required so that your claim for pain and suffering and the losses attached to it can be presented to the other side and to the Court.

By: Nick Jervis